![]() |
OPSEU Local 560 |
| The Local: March, 1998 |
VERONICA’S SECRET – OUT OF THE
CLOSET
Ted Montgomery, President, OPSEU Local
560
Both serve the same Harris agenda. You have heard of the leaked 1997-98 performance contract of Veronica Lacey, the Deputy Minister of Education and Training — the Secret from Veronica's Closet. Under the section headed “Restructuring of Colleges” are five points in the “Results Expected” column. They are these:
Under the results expected for elementary and secondary column, her performance contract states: “Plan for 1998-99: $667 million reduction in place.” Harris and Snobelen, and now Johnson, can try to dupe the public about it all they like. The truth is there in black and white — the figure established by the inner cabinet as Lacey’s target.
Why? Why take money out of the system? Why cut another 10,000 teachers out of the secondary schools? It can only diminish the quality of education and training which our schools provide.
Indeed, that is the government’s very intent. Make the public system less attractive so that those who can afford private education will be increasingly likely to spend their dollars there. We have seen this exact model recently in the U.S. The tax cut, by its regressive nature, furthers this initiative: take the money out of the public education system and place it into the hands of those who can turn it over to private educators. It is a strategy that suits both those who want our public system (like many school systems in the U.S.) left only to those who cannot afford better and Harris’ other friends, the large corporate and small-business private trainers.
To a great extent, Ontario’s colleges lack leaders committed to the public nature of their mandate. Presidents are all too eager either to privatize indirectly by turning to full-fee programs or to openly emulate the inferior practices and standards of the private trainers. They are likewise eager to reduce the number of highly qualified professors, to maximize class sizes and workload, slash program hours, reduce student/professor contact and to cut corners on educational quality. Make no mistake. The agenda is an attack on quality public education. It is manifested in Bill 160, and it underlies college management's bargaining agenda.
Management’s demand to lower preparation and evaluation credits in the workload formula. Management’s demand to sanction unlimited weekly teaching hours and teaching weeks. Their demand to open up the Instructor classification and eliminate professor positions from the colleges. Their demand to hold salaries below those of high school teachers. Their refusal to provide reasonable job security, to address professorial concerns about curriculum, class size, schedule, etc. Their attempt to renege on a letter of promise to address salary adjustments. All of these demonstrate the clear commonality of interests between this management negotiating committee and the objectives behind Bill 160.
Our responsibility, like that of our teaching
colleagues at the elementary and secondary levels is to be counted against
this regressive and destructive agenda. Our responsibility is to
fight to protect the quality of education in the colleges of this province.
The key change is that members whose years of service and age add up to 85 may retire with an unreduced pension. This is referred to as an 85 factor. Previously, age and service had to add up to 90. There is no minimum age or years of service required: the requirement is simply that age and years of service together add up to 85.
A member is also eligible for an unreduced pension if he or she has reached the age of 60 years and has at least 20 years of credited service.
EARLY RETIREMENT ON A REDUCED PENSION
Previously, if one took early retirement, pension was reduced 5% for each year retirement preceded age 65. That penalty factor has now been reduced to 3%. The penalty is imposed for each year that a person’s retirement precedes the earliest date that individual could receive an unreduced pension (i.e. the member reaches the 85 factor, or reaches age 60 with 20 years of service, or reaches the age of 65). So, a person 54 years of age who had 30 years of service would be penalized only 3% for the one year he/she was short of the 85 factor. The previous provisions would have created a penalty of 55%, five percent for every year under the age of 65.
Members with at least two years of service have been able to retire with a reduced pension at age 55. As of January 1, 1998, members aged 50-54, with at least 2 years of service will also be eligible to retire with a reduced pension.
Please note that these are
highlights of the changes. You may obtain further information from the
Local 560 Office, the Senior OPSEU benefits counsellor, Shirley McVittie
[tel. (416) 443-8888], or Employee Relations. You may also wish to
obtain advice from a financial consultant to see how your college pension
ties in with your other financial plans. Do not make a decision about
early retirement without obtaining further advice.
Here's a list of the pharmacies in our region that charged the lowest dispensing fees ($1.99 to $3.99) in 1997.
The Drug Store Pharmacy: 2670 Erin Centre
Blvd., Mississauga (905) 569-3356
The Drug Store Pharmacy: 3501 Yonge Street, North
York
The Drug Store Pharmacy: 173 Lakeshore
Road West, Oakville (905) 845-4946
The Drug Store Pharmacy: 11 Redway Road,
Toronto (416) 425-8433
The Drug Store Pharmacy: 985 Woodbine Avenue,
Toronto (416) 421-5727
The Drug Store Pharmacy: 650 Dupont Street,
Toronto (416) 588-4973
The Drug Store Pharmacy: 125 Harwood Avenue
North, Ajax (905) 427-9748
The Drug Store Pharmacy: 295 Queen Street East,
Brampton (905) 452-9011
The Drug Store Pharmacy: 2025 Guelph Line, Burlington
(905) 336-1112
The Drug Store Pharmacy: 245 Dixon Road,
Islington (416) 614-9175
The Drug Store Pharmacy: 620 Eglinton Avenue
West, Mississauga (905) 712-9626
The Drug Store Pharmacy: 6085 Creditview Road,
Mississauga (905) 858-1866
The Drug Store Pharmacy: 6220 Yonge Street
North York (416) 224-8615
The Drug Store Pharmacy: 1792 Liverpool
Road, Pickering (905) 831-6310
The Drug Store Pharmacy: 10909 Yonge Street,
Richmond Hill (905) 737-1840
The Drug Store Pharmacy: 1880 Eglinton
Avenue East, Scarborough (416) 750-4400
The Drug Store Pharmacy: 1450 Lawrence
Avenue East, Toronto (416) 755-9210
The Drug Store Pharmacy: 17 Leslie Street,
Toronto (416) 968-7283
Zellers Pharmacy: 6600 Yonge Street,
Willowdale (416) 226-3126
Zehrs Pharmacy: 24018 Woodbine Avenue,
Keswick (905) 476-1609
Zellers Pharmacy: 100 Kingston Road
East, Ajax (905) 683-6363
Miracle Ultra Mart: 25 Peel Centre Drive,
Bramalea (905) 793-0600
Miracle Ultra Mart: 751 Upper James
Street South, Hamilton (905) 575-7755
Fortinos Pharmacy: 65 Mall Road,
Hamilton
“It’s part of a global strategy to change the way teaching is done in the classroom,” says Gilbert Boileau, executive dean of student services at Boréal, “We’re getting away from a teaching environment to a learning environment.”
Boileau contends that the change will mean less direct teacher instruction and more opportunities for students to work alone and with each other in and beyond the classroom.
Translated into simpler language, this means students will pay more money for less instruction. Trotted out once again is that false dichotomy between “teaching” and “learning” environments. Administrators use it to rationalize education cuts and shift the blame for systemic inadequacies onto the shoulders of the suddenly obsolete teacher.
This “strategy” is yet another indication that college administrators are driven primarily by financial motives and not by concern for or knowledge of pedagogy. As Mr. Boileau says, “There will be different ways of doing business in the classroom.” Business? What happened to education in the classroom? When last did this administrator visit a class? He displays no realistic understanding of the nature of the learning environment or the pivotal role professors play.
“It is a glimpse of the future.”
This is the disheartening observation of Brian Desbiens, president of Sir
Sanford Fleming College and spokesperson for Ontario’s 25 college presidents:
He says that about half a dozen colleges are considering a similar plan.
When you retire, will you be getting the maximum pension benefits to which you are entitled? Did you know, for example, that you may be able to purchase benefits for prior service at another educational institute or as a sessional professor?
All continuous full-time faculty must join the CAAT Pension Plan when hired by the College. During periods of full-time employment, both you and the College contribute equally to your indexed pension. However, other options exist if, for instance, you take a leave of absence or pregnancy/parental leave or if you have accumulated prior service as a professor at another educational institute or as a sessional.
Leaves of Absence & Pregnancy/Parental
Leaves
If you take a leave without
pay, or a pregnancy/parental leave, the College should automatically provide
you with an election form on which you can indicate your choice regarding
your pension payments. During a leave of absence, you normally will
pay both the College's share and your share of the pension contribution.
During a pregnancy/parental leave, the college continues to pay its share
of the pension contribution. In any case, be sure to respect the deadlines
for payment election and pension contributions. For instance, if your leave
ends in 1997, you must pay your contribution by December 31, 1998.
Prior Service
If you have accumulated prior
full-time service with another educational institute with which there exists
a reciprocal arrangement, you may elect, at any time, to purchase pension
benefits for some or all of this period, by transferring all the funds
in the other employer’s pension plan to the CAAT plan. If you took a refund
of pension contributions, you may purchase service for this period only
if it was earned after December 31, 1991.
Prior Sessional Service
If you became a full-time
employee at Seneca College within 18 months of completing a sessional term
at the College, you are eligible, at any time, to purchase pension benefits
for earlier periods of sessional employment. Send your request to
Kim McGann of Employee Relations, including the years (and exact
dates, if possible) during which you were a sessional employee. Note, however,
that periods of part-time and partial-load employment are not eligible
for pension purchase.
Optional Service
You can purchase pension benefits
for previous service with other Canadian public service employers. As well,
if previously you didn't elect to purchase benefits within the deadline
prescribed for a situation such as a leave, you can elect to buy optional
service for this period. However, you will pay the full actuarial cost
of the benefit you are buying. The CAAT Pension Plan will calculate the
cost, which will include factors such as interest payments which generally
make this "delayed-purchase" option more expensive.
Disability Waiver
If you are receiving LTD (Long-Term
Disability) benefits, you remain a member of the CAAT Pension Plan,
accumulating credited service, but you make no contributions during this
period.
How to Apply for a Pension Purchase
If you are considering any
additional pension purchase, you should contact Kim McGann in Benefits
at Employee Relations. Denise Chan of Employee Relations is another source
of information on pension benefits. The College will investigate
the possibility of your purchasing this service and, where applicable,
will provide you with a "Request to Purchase" form which indicates all
your options. You will be copied on all subsequent related correspondence
between the plan administrators and the College.
Remember that past-service
pension adjustments will affect the limit of your RRSP contribution.
Before you make your final decision, we advise
that you also consult with the OPSEU Staff Benefits Counsellor, Shirley
McVittie at 443-8888, Ext. 657. You should also read the pamphlet entitled
CAAT Pension Plan Member Handbook which explains our pension plan in more
detail.
By January 1996, however, it was pretty obvious to about eight of us, who had been appointed to the English Department in 1990 and '91, that we'd soon be joining the growing roll-call of laid-off teachers. Sure enough, on February 27, of about 1,000 employees at George Brown College, 260 (half academic and half support staff) lost their jobs. I was one of them. Because of funding cuts, my lay-off notice informed me, my position as a professor had been "made redundant," effective May 27.
I wasn't shocked that I was laid off. What shocked me was seeing teachers with as much as 17 years' seniority get dumped. I was 35 years old, with a degree in English: if push came to shove, I could perhaps fall back on my bartending experience. (An amazing number of bartenders have degrees in English, history and philosophy.) It was hard, however, to imagine the future career options of a 55-year-old math teacher.
Determined to land on my feet, I took advantage of a college-offered retraining package and submitted a proposal. (It would pay my salary and benefits for 90 days while I worked for an agency that agreed to take me on.) By May 10, two weeks to go to my official lay-off, I had taught the last of my classes and finished submitting final grades. Normally these two weeks of non-teaching days would have been used for doing such tasks as revising courses and selecting textbooks. It's been my experience that teaching staff generally negotiate with their chairs about how such time is to be spent. This time, however, nothing happened. The semester came to a quiet, unceremonious end. I packed up my desk and went home.
As my retraining date neared, I still hadn't heard if my proposal had been approved. Four days before my retraining was to begin, a human resources manager had some good news for me: my proposal was approved. However, unbeknownst to me, I had been released from my non-teaching duties as of the May 10 deadline for submitting grades. In other words, I was supposed to already be two and a half weeks into the retraining that I had not yet begun. My grievance is now with an arbitrator.
Soon after my retraining was over, I submitted my resignation and collected my two-months-plus vacation pay and severance pay. By this time I held no hope of recall, and my partner had been laid off the previous spring.
At the end of August, just
as I was planning my first visit to the unemployment office, I got
a surprise phone call. Another campus wanted to know if I would like a
sessional (non-union) contract position. The job would be guaranteed until
just before Christmas. However, there would be no sick days. No vacation
days. No health plan. Most significantly, no restrictions on workload.
I took it.
As a unionized employee, I had never taught more
than five three-hour classes a week, the rest of my time being spent on
preparation and evaluation. Non-unionized sessional teachers, however,
are apparently supposed to prepare their classes and evaluate students
in their sleep.
In pre-Mike Harris days, I taught five classes a semester to between 120 and 140 students. In my first semester after the Tory landslide, my student roster swelled to 180 students. Now as a sessional employee, and 18 months into the Common Sense Revolution juggernaut, I had 300 students in six classes. In other words, I was doing a lot more work for a lot less money.
Although I had only been guaranteed employment until Christmas, I was told that the job might last until this spring. That was not to be. As I sat hunched over my desk on December 23, entering final grades into bubble sheets, my chair entered the office. "I just wanted to thank you," she said, "for helping us out this semester."
I packed up my desk and went home.
I had hoped never to turn this column into a personal diatribe about the difficulties of my life as a teacher. After all, many workers in Canada have seen harder times than mine. But now, as the anniversary of my lay-off approaches -- and as I work my way through the pain and humiliation of that time -- my thoughts come to rest upon my students, many of whose names I never learned since the cuts began and their numbers became impossibly large, many of whose lives I never learned about.
A sick feeling comes over me
about what they are really being taught.
Dr. Ceci taught his first-semester developmental-psychology class using the same methodology as he had for 20 years. When he repeated the course in the second semester, he kept everything the same, with two exceptions: he changed the pitch of his voice and used more gestures. Then he compared the student ratings for each semester.
The second-semester ratings showed Dr. Ceci to be more knowledgeable, tolerant, fair, organized, and accessible than did the ratings from the first semester. Moreover, the second semester students claimed to have learned more, although they performed no better than the earlier group on the same examination. Dr. Ceci concluded that “the highest marks go to the most enthusiastic — not necessarily the best — teachers.”
| THE LOCAL is a publication of OPSEU Local 560, the faculty of Seneca College. Please feel free to copy any original material with appropriate credit. We welcome submissions, which should be sent to Patricia Clark, Ted Montgomery, or Larry Olivo at the Newnham Campus. 2942 Finch Avenue East, Suite 119, Scarborough, Ontario, M1W 2T4. Tel (416) 495-1599 Fax: (416) 495-7573 email opseu560@idirect.com |